“The right of the people to be secure in their persons,
houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall
not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,
supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be
searched, and the persons or things to be seized,” the Fourth Amendment of the
Bill of Rights.
Why
would our Founding Fathers want to guarantee this right for the American
people? To understand the reason why, we need to understand how this right was
violated during our colonial period before the revolution.
The
British had fought a long and costly war against the French, what was known in
the colonies as the “French and Indian War.” England needed to raise money to
pay off the debt they incurred during the war and decided to tax her British
subjects in the colonies. On March 22, 1765, Parliament passed the Stamp Act.
What
was the Stamp Act? It was a new tax that required American colonists to pay a
tax on every piece of printed paper they used. This tax was on such items as newspapers,
legal documents, posters, ship’s papers, even playing cards.
The Stamp Act represented the
first direct tax on the American colonies. British subjects in the colonies
were used to taxes and duties imposed on their trade to regulate their
commerce, but not to raise money. Colonists like Patrick Henry objected to this
tax on the ground that the colonists were not being represented in London. This
objection led to the well-known battle cry, “No Taxation without
Representation!”
However,
London wanted more than to raise money through a direct tax on its British
subjects residing in the American colonies, they were also looking to curb
their subject’s trade with the French and the Dutch (Danish West Indies). American
colonists were trading with these foreigners because they could obtain many
goods, like molasses and sugar, for a cheaper price than the British brands. These
cheaper prices and expensive British duties led to smuggling in the colonies.
Writs
of assistance were issued to customs officers to ensure that paper goods were
stamped according to the Stamp Act guidelines and those homes and businesses in
the colonies were free from smuggled goods. These search warrants authorized
the holder to search any house for smuggled goods without specifying either the
house or the goods. It was easy for a custom officer to be issued a writ of
assistance, since the royal governor would legally pocket a third of all the
fines imposed on the smugglers that were unlucky enough to get caught.
Attorney
James Otis Jr. argued against the legality of these search warrants in a legal
dispute in 1761. Otis contended that the “writ is against the fundamental
principles of laws…[and] destructive to English liberty.” A young man by the
name of John Adams was in that Massachusetts courtroom that day and wrote in
his diary: “Every man appeared to me to go away, as I did, ready to take arms
against writs of assistance.”
What
of today? Are we asked to pay for our nation’s wars? Are there taxes imposed on
us to pay for such things? Are there duties and taxes imposed on us to regulate
our trade today? Yes, there are such
taxes.
Is
there evidence of illegal searches being conducting in our homes, places of
business, or even in our correspondence with each other? Do we have a reemergence
of those unlawful writs of assistance in our day and age? Is the Fourth
Amendment under attack today?
What of the searching of our
internet communications?
"A
Constitution of Government once changed from Freedom, can never be restored.
Liberty, once lost, is lost forever," John Adams in a Letter to Abigail
Adams (July 7, 1775).
We
cannot afford to let our liberties slip away from us. We cannot afford to
forget the past. We cannot be made to believe that which took place over 200
years ago has nothing to do with us today. We must spread the message of
liberty to our fellow Americans. We must defend those rights and liberties that
so many bled and died for. Protect the Fourth Amendment America. Protect your
rights.
No comments:
Post a Comment