In
1858, Stephen A. Douglas and Abraham Lincoln participated in seven debates for
one of the two United States Senate seats for the State of Illinois. During the
course of the debates, slavery was one of the main topics discussed between the
two candidates; however, Lincoln’s previous objections of the Mexican War known
as the “spotty resolutions,” which led to his nickname, “Spotty Lincoln,”
resurfaced in order to discredit his warlike attacks on the Democratic Party
and their political agenda during the debates.[1]
Douglas used Lincoln’s insistence of determining “the place where the thing was
done” or spot as an attack against Lincoln’s attempts to avoid “the thing
itself” being discussed.[2]
The
spot, of which Douglas teased Lincoln for, referred to the exact location in
which the Mexican War had commenced from in 1846 under the term of President
James K. Polk. Texas had been annexed from Mexico on December 29, 1845, and
according to The Treaty of Annexation, Article III, “All titles and claims to
real estate, which are valid under the laws of Texas, shall be held to be so by
the United States; and measures shall be adopted for the speedy adjudication of
all unsettled claims to land.”[3]
However, there was a disputed boundary line between Texas and Mexico between the
two rivers of the Nueces and the Rio Grande. The United States insisted that
the border ran along the Rio Grande, while Mexico insisted on the former. As
negotiations were being attempted to settle the disputed boundary, Polk sent in
the military under the command of Zachary Taylor to defend their claimed
territory as Mexico did the same.
Tensions
between the two armies were on the raise as they set up camps on either side of
the Rio Grande near the city of Matamoras in March 1846. The Mexicans struck
first when two of Taylors Dragoons moving ahead of the main force on March 28,
“were pounced upon by a party of Mexicans and carried off prisoners to
Matamoras,” though later returned.[4]
After several exchanges of words between Taylor and the Mexican forces, the
American forces implemented a naval blockade of the river.[5]
American Colonel Cross was abducted by Mexican Rancheros during his daily
morning ride and was later found murdered.[6]
While Lieutenant Porter was out leading an American “fatigue party of ten men,”
his men were fired upon by Mexican forces in which Porter and three of his men
were killed.[7]
After receiving intelligence that approximately 4,000 Mexican soldiers crossed
the Rio Grande into Texas, Taylor sent some of his forces to investigate; as a
result, more American forces were attacked and killed.[8]
These clashes continued between the two forces until on May 3, “the
Mexicans…opened a heavy cannonading upon the American fort [across from
Matamoras], throwing balls and shells with little intermission, until
midnight.”[9]
Finally, all-out war broke out between the two armies at the Battle of Palo
Alto on May 8, and Resaca de la Palma on May 9; which ushered in the Mexican
War and controversial “spot” that Lincoln addressed in Congress on December 22,
1847.
Lincoln
questioned Polk’s various messages in 1846 concerning the events that led to
the war with Mexico. He especially attacked Polk’s December 8, revelation that
Mexico was “the aggressor” and had invaded “our soil in hostile array,” while “shedding
the blood of our citizens.”[10]
It was from this approach that Lincoln demanded to know the truth as to the
“particular spot on which the blood of our citizens was so shed.”[11]
Everything rested upon the spot of the attacks to determine, 1) was it on United
States soil, 2) were those being assaulted American citizens or soldiers, and
3) whether or not the conflict was instigated by the “approach of the United
States army.”[12]
Later, Lincoln also illustrated his position on the war as being “unnecessarily
and unconstitutionally begun by the President of the United States” when he
voted on the amendment for the resolution presented to the House to thank
General Taylor for his service during the war on January 3, 1848.[13]
When
Lincoln questioned the Mexican War, the nation was already two years into the
conflict. His opposition to the war was not necessarily a concern over the
legality of the conflict or some distress over the loss of life, but was a
political move by the Whigs to attack the character of Polk and the Democratic
Party. However, his resolutions calling for the “spot” backfired in its
intended object and the Democrats successfully used Lincoln’s “spotty” talk
against him from their various newspapers to the debates of 1858. “Democrats
gleefully hung the nickname ‘Spotty’ around Lincoln’s neck, and in Lincoln’s
home district, Democratic political rallies in Charleston, Peoria, and
Jacksonville howled with delight over ‘Spotty’ Lincoln’s ‘case of spotted
fever.’”[14]
[1] Abraham
Lincoln and Stephen Arnold Douglas, Political
Debates Between Abraham Lincoln and Stephen A. Douglas in the Celebrated
Campaign of 1858 in Illinois, Including the Preceding Speeches of Each at
Chicago, Springfield, Etc, (Cleveland: The Burrows Brothers Company, 1894), 278.
[2] Ibid,
223-224.
[3] “The
Treaty of Annexation – Texas; April 12, 1844,” The Avalon Project, accessed June 16, 2015, http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/texan05.asp.
[4] Zachary
Taylor, Life and Public Services of Gen.
Z. Taylor: Including a Minute Account of His Defence of Fort Harrison, in 1812;
The Battle of Okee-Chobee, in 1837; and the Battles of Palo Alto and Resaca De
La Palma, in 1846, (New York: H. Long & Brother, Publishers, 1846),
20-21.
[5] Ibid,
22.
[6] Ibid.
[7] Ibid.
[8] Ibid,
23.
[9] Ibid,
24.
[10] Ida
M. Tarbell, The Life of Abraham Lincoln:
Drawn From Original Sources and Containing Many Speeches, Letters and Telegrams
Hitherto Unpublished, Volume One, (New York: McClure, Phillips & Co.,
1900), 213.
[11]
Ibid.
[12]
Ibid.
[13] The Bedford Gazette. (Bedford, Pa.), Chronicling America: Historic American
Newspapers. Lib. of Congress, June 15, 1860. http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn82005159/1860-06-15/ed-1/seq-2/.
[14]Allen
C. Guelzo, Abraham Lincoln: Redeemer
President, (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1999), 139.
No comments:
Post a Comment