I'm
not sure what this person was being apprehended for, but it sure seems to me
that he did not need three policemen to kick him while he was down.
Is the standard operation in bringing down a criminal today to taze them, beat them, then cuff them? How often does something like this happen?
This also does not give me confidence in relinquishing my Second Amendment right leaving firearms only in the hands of the military and law enforcement. Seeing this does not make me feel safer in a world where only policemen have firearms.
Is the standard operation in bringing down a criminal today to taze them, beat them, then cuff them? How often does something like this happen?
This also does not give me confidence in relinquishing my Second Amendment right leaving firearms only in the hands of the military and law enforcement. Seeing this does not make me feel safer in a world where only policemen have firearms.
"Whereas civil-rulers, not having their duty to
the people duly before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as military forces,
which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their
power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the
article in their right to keep and bear their private arms."
--
Tench Coxe, in Remarks on the
First Part of the Amendments to the Federal Constitution.
"Certainly one of the
chief guarantees of freedom under any government, no matter how popular and
respected, is the right of citizens to keep and bear arms ... The right of
citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government, one
more safeguard, against the tyranny which now appears remote in America but
which historically has proven to be always possible."
-- Hubert H. Humphrey, Senator, Vice President, 22 October 1959.
No comments:
Post a Comment